🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.