🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers launched a fresh game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this mode mirrors the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few key adjustments:

• Every squad includes only eight real players, with the remaining filled by 32 bots.
• Actions done by human gamers grant full XP, while AI activities offer lower rewards.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Cairo Siege and Empire State.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, this mode lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume it's a good idea, since it provides additional choices for gamers seeking alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 fans are mad.

Player Responses: From Fury to Support

"People want real players. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while someone else details everything they believe to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this game 24/7. Let them strike a balance," adds a different comment. One reply on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Concerns and Community Feedback

All that said, there are valid points to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it will make wait times more extended for other modes due to the sheer number of options currently available. On a similar note, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide full XP, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the community meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this mode as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

If Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments being too difficult were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.